Questions? Contact us:
[email protected]

Master Music for Streaming

Quick Answer

Mastering music for streaming is the process of preparing a song or project for distribution on a digital streaming platform. When doing so, the process is similar to a typical mastering session, but the song’s LUFS and the intended platform’s loudness normalization process need to be kept in mind.

Mastering Music for Streaming in Detail

Each streaming service requires slightly altered mastering.

Each streaming service requires slightly altered mastering.

With the increased use of streaming services as a means of listening to music and the relatively low cost of distributing to these platforms, online streaming is here to stay. With that in mind, the process of mastering for streaming services such as Spotify and Apple Music has become a popular topic.

In truth, the mastering process is relatively unchanged from a traditional or typical mastering session, with one very important caveat. Using software known as ReplayGain or RG for short, Spotify and other streaming platforms implement loudness normalization to create a steady, mostly even playback in terms of loudness amongst multiple songs. The mastering engineer needs to keep this in mind when creating a master intended for streaming distribution.

Spotify allows listeners to turn off normalization, but it on by default.

Spotify allows listeners to turn off normalization, but it's on by default.

Let’s take an in-depth look at the information needed to make informed decisions when mastering for streaming. Again, mastering for streaming may be a relatively similar process to typical mastering, but small changes can have a substantial impact on the sound and quality of your master when played back on streaming platforms.

Mastering engineers now need to keep normalization in mind while mastering.

Mastering engineers now need to keep normalization in mind while mastering.

We’ll be discussing loudness normalization, how and when it’s applied across different platforms, how it can negatively impact your master, and how to make sure your master falls within the desired LUFS.

If this is something that you’d rather have done by a professional mastering engineer, send us one of your songs here: https://www.sageaudio.com/register.php

We’ll master it for you and send you a free mastered sample.

Loudness Normalization

To better understand loudness normalization, let’s compare it to how radio stations process and playback songs.

Radio stations alter music somewhat similarly to how streaming services do.

Radio stations alter music somewhat similarly to how streaming services do.

The concept of loudness normalization is very similar to how radio stations operate, but with some important differences. During radio playback, or slightly prior to it, songs are processed using compression and equalization. Radio stations implement this for the sake of creating a uniform sound on their station, and if we’re being honest, to make their station sound louder than others (unless you’re listening to a classical music radio station).

This processing alters the frequency response and dynamics of the song - sometimes resulting in a highly compressed signal, intended to sound loud even through the most uncooperative car stereo-system amplifiers.

Radio stations typically make their music louder, to accommodate subpar amplifiers.

Radio stations typically make their music louder, to accommodate subpar amplifiers.

Although similar, this is different than the process of loudness normalization. Loudness normalization works by first measuring the perceived loudness of the track and then applying clean gain if needed. It should be noted that the gain added during loudness normalization is ‘clean’ due to the lack of harmonic generation, or distortion associated with any analog equipment or analog emulation.

Prior to broadcasting, most radio stations compress and equalize their signal.

Prior to broadcasting, most radio stations compress and equalize their signal.

Once the track is measured, based on the ideal or set LUFS or Loudness Units relative to Full Scale, the track has it’s perceived volume increased, or decreased with this clean gain.

Of course, changing the gain of a track has the potential to change its perceived loudness, but it does not have the ability to change its dynamic range. This is a very important distinction between Loudness Normalization, and the processing radio stations implement. With Loudness Normalization the perceived loudness is changed, but the dynamics and frequency spectrum stay intact; with Radio Stations the perceived loudness, the dynamics, and the frequency spectrum are changed.

Loudness normalization does not affect dynamics.

Loudness normalization does not affect dynamics.

If you’d like to learn about dynamic range and compressors, check out our blog where we have numerous videos about compressors and dynamic based techniques: https://www.sageaudio.com/blog/mixing

When and How Loudness Normalization is Applied

Now that we understand that Loudness Normalization does not affect the dynamic range of your track, let’s discuss when and how it’s implemented during streaming distribution.

As stated previously, streaming services use software known as ReplayGain or RG. RG’s job is to perform loudness normalization to tracks on the streaming service, to provide a uniform listening experience for any users.

ReplayGain scans and encodes data for normalized playback.

ReplayGain scans and encodes data for normalized playback.

It measures a track’s perceived loudness in LUFS, and then encodes it with instructions that it can later read. These instructions detail how many LUFS the track needs to be amplified or attenuated to ensure normalized playback. ReplayGain will adjust each track’s loudness prior to playback and will do so in an identical way each time the song is played.

Replay gain ensures that all tracks sound similar during playback.

Replay gain ensures that all tracks sound similar during playback.

It should be noted that this process occurs within Spotify’s, Apple Music’s or whatever streaming service’s platform. It does not and should not occur during the mastering process, meaning that normalization shouldn’t be used during mastering.

So if you’re mastering for the sake of streaming, the primary thing you will need to keep in mind is what loudness your track will be normalized to. This will determine how loud you will make your master.

Loudness Normalization Across Platforms

Knowing the normalization settings of a streaming service is integral to mastering for it. You should know how loud your track should be prior to exporting and distributing your song to that service.

Here is a quick list of the different normalization settings for each streaming platform. Keep in mind that this may change with time, as each company has the ability to change how they implement loudness normalization. Also, these numbers, although accurate, are not exact. They may be off by roughly .5dB, or another minuscule amount.


YouTube: -12.5 LUFS

This is great info to know when considering releasing a music or lyric video.

This is great info to know when considering releasing a music or lyric video.

Spotify: -14 LUFS

Spotify's "Normal" loudness setting is -14 LUFS

Spotify's "Normal" loudness setting is -14 LUFS

Tidal: -14.5 LUFS

In addition to offering hi-fidelity streaming, Tidal also implements loudness normalization.

In addition to offering hi-fidelity streaming, Tidal also implements loudness normalization.

Pandora: -13.5 LUFS

Although Pandora may not be the go-to streaming service, it's still useful to know it's normalization setting.

Although Pandora may not be the go-to streaming service, it's still useful to know it's normalization setting.

Apple Music: -16LUFS

Apple Music has since taken over iTunes, and employs the same Normalization settings as their iTune's soundcheck function.

Apple Music has taken over iTunes, and employs the same Normalization settings as their iTune's soundcheck function.

So what does this mean for you master? Let’s look at some examples to understand it practically.

So, if you were to bounce your track out at -16 LUFS, YouTube would increase the volume of your track by 3.5 dB, Spotify by 2dB, Tidal by 1.5dB, and Pandora by 2.5dB.

Conversely, if your track was bounced out louder than the settings above, it would be attenuated. So, if you bounced your track out at -10 LUFS, YouTube would decrease the volume of your track by 2.5 dB, Spotify by 4dB, Tidal by 4.5dB, and Pandora by 3.5dB.

(You should note, that it has been speculated that YouTube’s loudness normalization only occurs when the track is louder than its current normalization setting. This means if the audio is quieter than -12.5 LUFS, it will not be brought up to that loudness. Considering YouTube is more elusive than other platforms when it comes to how they normalize audio, this may need to be tested before claiming it to be entirely true.)

YouTube is slightly elusive regarding its loudness normalization settings.

YouTube is slightly elusive regarding its loudness normalization settings.

Again, it is important to remember that during this process the dynamics of your track are not changing, nor is distortion or equalization being used. The only thing that is changing is the loudness of your track. This means that in most circumstances, the quality of your master will not be degraded.

Loudness normalization does not introduce distortion.

Loudness normalization does not introduce distortion.

But let’s take a look at how Loudness Normalization can negatively impact your master and the circumstances needed for this degradation to occur.

If you’re an artist looking to distribute your song, and you need some more help on the process, check out our blog titled:“ Everything you Need to Know About Releasing a Song,****” for more information.

How Loudness Normalization Can Negatively Impact Your Master

As we’ve already gone over, loudness normalization does not impact the dynamics of your master; however, it can make it sound far less dynamic than other masters. How does this work?

When CDs were the primary form of distribution and playback, something popularly known as the “Loudness Wars” took hold of the mastering process. Predicated on the notion that louder masters sound better, and uninhibited by the limitations of previous audio mediums (cassettes, vinyl records, etc.) mastering engineers soon attempted to make the loudest masters possible.

Excessively loud masters only made real "sense" during the era of the CD.

Excessively loud masters only made real "sense" during the era of the CD.

By doing so, they popularized the use of brick wall limiting in the final stages of mastering. The idea being, if you cut off the transients and the dynamics, you can increase the overall level of the track, in turn making the quieter aspects louder, and causing the overall perceived loudness to increase. Essentially, dynamics were sacrificed for the sake of loudness.

Using a limiter will affect your dynamic range.

Using a limiter will affect your dynamic range.

Now that streaming is the popular form of distribution, and streaming platforms use loudness normalization, louder masters are being turned down. Since they’ve had their dynamics squashed when mastered, when compared to other masters at the same volume, they sound even more compressed and lifeless.

Compared to other masters, a loud master will sound quieter when normalized.

Compared to other masters, a loud master will sound quieter when normalized.

Essentially, quieter masters that were not processed with brick wall limiting, or least didn’t use it excessively, will be played back at a normalized volume. These masters will sound dynamic, whereas heavily compressed and limited masters will lack dynamics. When played side by side there is an obvious difference in quality.

If mastered too loud, your track will be turned down during normalization.

If mastered too loudly, your track will be turned down during normalization.

With that said, creating loud masters doesn’t make sense any more especially when their primary medium is digital streaming. By mastering loudly, and attenuating transients and dynamics, all that you’d be doing is creating a squashed sound. Since it all plays back at the same volume, there are few if any reasons to create a master louder than the normalization setting of the intended streaming platform.

Creating loud mastered doesn't make sense if normalization will be introduced.

Creating loud mastered doesn't make sense if normalization will be introduced.

Furthermore, it should be stressed that quieter masters don’t sound better when normalized simply because they are quieter. They sound better because there were not processed with brick wall limiting. In fact, you could create a quiet master that sounds just as squashed as a loud master by using brick wall limiting and then turning down the track’s volume. If this track was normalized and had its overall volume turned up, it would sound just as squashed as a loud master that had its volume turned down by normalization.

All this to say that dynamics are the key aspect here. Maintain dynamics, and avoid brick wall limiting when creating a master for streaming.

Using Metering to Ensure Your Master is Ready for Streaming

VU meters are incredibly helpful when determining dynamics.

VU meters are incredibly helpful when determining dynamics.

Despite the fact we can’t control how these streaming platforms normalize our masters, we can measure the loudness of ours using the same measurements, and adjust accordingly. The 3 meters you will need for this process are an LUFS meter, a True Peak Meter, and a VU meter.

With these 3 meters, you’ll be able to measure the integrated loudness, the digital peaks and overs, and get a good sense of the dynamic range. Place these meters after your final processing stage to get an accurate measurement for each parameter.

LUFS

Integrated LUFS is the same metric ReplayGain uses to measure track loudness.

Integrated LUFS is the same metric ReplayGain uses to measure track loudness.

A great option for an LUFS meter is the Izotope Insight plugin, which offers the integrated LUFS, the short term LUFS, the Momentary Max LUFS, and the Loudness Range LUFS. If you didn’t get the VU meter and the True Peak meter, you’d still be able to get a great sense of your song’s loudness and dynamic range with this plugin.

Before playing the track, ensure that the metering has been reset. Once it has, play the track all the way thru without making any adjustments to ensure an accurate reading.

Ideally, the master will be at roughly the integrated LUFS of the platform to which you plan to distribute.

If it goes over slightly, it’s truly no need for concern. For example, if your master is at -12 LUFS and you aimed for Spotify’s -14 LUFS, if you aren’t truncating your transients, or using brick wall limiting, it will sound almost identical when it’s adjusted -2dB by ReplayGain.

True Peak

True Peak meters ensure that clipping distortion does not occur.

True Peak meters ensure that clipping distortion does not occur.

Most LUFS meters incorporate a True Peak meter in there somewhere - that’s exactly the case with the Waves WLM Loudness meter. Not only does it give you LUFS, True Peak, and allow you to set your specifications, it also allows you to export a CVS file with which you can document and observe the loudness of your project on a second-by-second basis.

This may seem excessive to some, but if you find numbers comforting then this is a great plugin for you.

The true peak meter allows you to accurately discern if you have an over or any clipping. Sometimes typical dB meters are not exactly accurate. A true peak meter ensures you know when your master is clipping.

VU

This Waves Dorrough meter is a versatile VU meter.

This Waves Dorrough meter is a versatile VU meter.

VU meters are a great way to get a feel for the dynamic range of your master. It’s even more helpful when the VU meter has color-coded metering, demonstrating good levels for the normal persistence and peak range. That being said, a great option is the Waves Dorrough Plugin.

If you do decide to use this plugin as your go-to VU meter, keep in mind that the aforementioned persistence and peak levels may not always suit what you’re trying to create. But, adhering to them is a great way to ensure your integrated loudness and your peaks are distinct and separate. If they are, it means you have a decent dynamic range.

If you don’t feel like getting all three meters, or you prefer to keep things simple, most LUFS plugins offer a Loudness Range function, which is definitely useful.

These 3 meters can be used to determine if your song has the correct loudness, a decent dynamic range, and isn’t peaking.

If you don’t intend to use all 3, the most important is the integrated, and dynamic range LUFS meters.

Conclusion

Mastering for streaming service may not change the actual process too terribly much, but the matter of loudness definitely changes a lot. Mastering too loud now has penalties that can’t be remedied by sounding louder than other masters. Everything is on the same loudness playing field so to speak - and dynamics are the key to creating an impressive master.

Dynamics are, as they've always been, incredibly important when mastering.

Dynamics are, as they've always been, incredibly important when mastering.

To recap, each streaming platform implements loudness normalization differently. These are metrics any mastering needs to know if he or she intends to create a master best suited for a particular streaming service.

When loudness normalization is applied, it occurs within the streaming service and is typically performed by a software known as ReplayGain. ReplayGain amplifies or attenuates the signal using “clean” gain, or in other words, gain that doesn’t introduce any distortion or equalization to the signal.

This means that the signal is relatively the same if it was made louder or quieter, considering that loudness normalization does not affect dynamic range. The only time this processing will have a negative effect is when the master has had it’s dynamics truncated using brick wall limiting. When compared to non-truncated masters, brick wall limited masters will sound less impressive.

So, if you want to master properly for streaming services know the normalization settings (listed earlier in this blog), don’t use brick wall limiting or heavy compression on your master, and export your master relatively close to the normalization setting of your selected streaming service by using the proper metering.

If you’d like to hear your mix professionally mastered, using solely analog equipment, send us your mix here: https://www.sageaudio.com/register.php

We’ll master it for you and send you a free mastered sample.

Have you mastered music for streaming?



Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...

You're literally one step away from 10 times better sound.

The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.

START NOWREAD OUR REVIEWS

Review by Joel S.

If you're looking for great mastering, Sage is where you need to be. I've been working with Sage for years - they do an amazing job and are really easy to work with.

They actually care about your project and want it to sound its best just as much as you do. I'm always excited to get a song or project back from mastering. I've tried many mastering companies, and Sage is by far the best.

If you're serious about your music, it's worth checking them out; you won't be disappointed - they make your mixes sound balanced and professional.

They also offer mixing feedback to help improve your mixes and mixing and mastering education courses to help improve your sound. Shout out to Sage Audio! you can't go wrong - like I said, if you're serious about your music, this is your studio.

Review by April K.

I've been getting my masters done by Sage Audio for the past 4 years now, and I've tried multiple places in my 15 years in the music business. Sage Audio is the only one that has given me the quality I love!

Their mastering membership is an excellent deal for anyone looking for professional mastering and full customer service. Also, I never had an issue with submitting new mix versions for remastering or asking for too many revisions - they have always been very respectful about remastering new mixes and making any adjustments I wanted. I'm staying with Sage, no need to look further! Best masters out there!

Review by Justin G.

Sage Audio is by far the best audio engineering company I've found. I've been with them for 8 years, and it's clear that they set the bar high in regard to mastering services. Their online platform makes it easy to upload tracks and communicate directly with your own dedicated mastering engineer, and their customer service is excellent.

Overall, the sound achieved by Sage Audio engineers is awesome. Their mastering brings out the best in each track - improving clarity, depth, and impact - and they focus on crafting personalized masters that are specific to your needs.

Another thing that sets Sage Audio apart from other mastering services is that the mastering is actually done with your dedicated mastering engineer and not some sort of AI software, and you get full customer service and feedback on your mixes too.

Their commitment to delivering top-tier mastering while maintaining consistent communication shows how much they care about their clients' music. For anyone looking for a personalized online mastering that combines top-level quality with excellent customer service, look no further than Sage Audio.

Review by James T.

The engineers at Sage Audio could not have made my first commercial audio experience any better! Every time I emailed to get a question answered, I worked with the same person consistently.

They know what they are doing; after listening to my masters on numerous systems, I heard my music in a whole new light. My bass and kick were tighter, not muddy, and hit with the "grit" that I intended. My mids and highs were clear, vibrant, and presented well on all stereos and devices.

I could have never achieved this level of quality without their diligent minds and professional know-how! If you are looking to get your project up to a commercial level while meeting a budget, Sage Audio is the place to go!

Review by Rebecca D.

Sage Audio is by far the best mastering service! They are the most professional, kind, and loyal people. Every song they mastered was spot on!

For artists looking to have their music mastered, they have an awesome and affordable mastering membership and are dedicated to making every mix sound like a professional master. Thank you, Sage Audio, for transforming my music!

Review by Daniel S.

The last ten years of my audio mixing career have been plagued by frustration, self-doubt, and compulsive shopping for magic game-changing plugins that can fix my poor mixes... guess what... it was all wasted time and money; I was shooting in the dark.

Until now.

I had heard about Sage Audio a long time ago, but at that time, their pricing seemed too expensive - how wrong I was.

Firstly, there is no substitute for hard work; you must do your part; what this service gave me was perspective - what's different about this master from my own? why? what am I missing? how can I improve my final mixdown in order to get the best possible master?

The included courses are really useful and well explained, but to me, the real power is the community of engineers offering their feedback; there's nothing like a second set of ears, or a lot of sets of ears! Getting other engineers' advice is priceless, and fixing common problems suddenly became very simple.

The best part is that I have made a bunch of mixes on my own now and am starting to get incredibly good responses - my confidence is up, with no additional plugins, no new DAW, not even new monitors.

I've been a Sage Audio member for about 9 months now, and all services are excellent. The 1-on-1 mixing feedback is incredibly helpful, and the professional community is way more active than I could have imagined. I'll be here for the long haul. So, if you're ready to take your music to the next level and change a lot of misconceptions, this is your place!

Review by Thomas E.

I am a musician and songwriter with decent recording skills, but I could never get my final mixes mastered to where the EQ, volume, and clarity sounded good on all playback systems without distortion.

I did extensive research on mastering and tried expensive studio headphones, but I never quite "mastered" mastering. It was very frustrating and took way too much time away from my music.

Then I found Sage Audio, and it sounded like just the service I needed at a reasonable price, so I joined their membership.

It was a game-changing decision. They always respond quickly and are focused on pleasing their customers. They mastered several of my songs, and they all came out perfect.

One of them took three takes because I had to change some levels and panning, but each time, they said, "No problem, we want you to be 100% happy with the final master."

They even asked for ways to improve their service, and they have a unique service where you can upload your mixes and receive feedback directly from them for improvement. I also found in the community, there are great musicians, singers, and songwriters to collaborate with for future projects.

In summary, Sage Audio has saved me a lot of time and provided great masters for my songs, way better than I could have ever done! I give them my highest recommendation.

Review by Frank B.

I've been using Sage Audio for a while now and have been very pleased with their professionalism and quality of work!

I'm NOT new to the audio production world and have been mixing and self-mastering for over a decade. I've used Grammy-winning mastering engineers as well as online AI-driven mastering services, so I know the full range of mastering services available to artists and their producers.

What sets Sage apart, IMO, and, in my experience, is that they are very customer-centric and will do almost anything to make the customer happy with their work. An example is a recent master I wasn't 100% happy with because it was too compressed for Classical material. They jumped right on it, giving me another more gently compressed master, which I'm delighted with. This was a NO EXTRA CHARGE. I know from experience that this isn't the norm in this industry, where egos prevail.

An example of Sage's superior work is when a client I'm working with wanted proof that it was better than a well-known, low-cost AI-driven mastering service. While my instructions to both Sage and the online service were close, only Sage had a human to interpret some of the instructions. As a result, the Sage master was considerably LOUDER and had more HEADROOM to boot. You can't ask for much more for a Pop song.

In summary, I'd recommend Sage to anyone looking for professional mastering for their upcoming release.

Give them a shot. I'm sure you'll be pleased.

Review by Dan Y.

Sage Audio has been a lifesaver for me. Mastering was my weakest point, and I only wish I could've found them sooner. I have used their services for the last 6 months and have also recommended them to several of my musician friends. Every track I send comes back sounding brilliant.

I once experimented by mastering one of my songs by myself, by another leading mastering studio, and also by Sage Audio. Sage's master was hands-down the best: clear, loud, yet dynamic, and the overall sound was smooth. I can say with 100% confidence Sage Audio is the best mastering service around.

It's also a pleasure connecting with their team on a personal level; they are very attentive to details and respond fast.

Review by Irene F.

I found Sage Audio when I was searching for a company that could master my original songs. My initial email was responded to in less than ten minutes. I explained my situation, then created an account and uploaded my mix for mastering.

I let my engineer know what was bothering me in the song and what I would like it to sound like. In a short time, he sent me a notification email to download the master and asked if it was to my liking.

On first listen, it blew me away, as it contained everything I had asked for, and the sound was vibrant, clear, and, quite frankly, perfect. I've been with Sage Audio ever since - they're so easy to work with, friendly, eager to help, and highly professional. I would recommend them to anyone.

Review by Aaron C.

I first used Sage audio 3 years ago to get an album mastered. I hadn't used an outside service for mastering before, so I didn't know exactly what to expect, but I had learned a lot from the Sage Audio YouTube channel and liked the clear, concise way the videos explained various audio principles, so I felt comfortable using their services.

Not only did the masters sound amazing (dynamic, but still as loud as I wanted), but the engineer answered all of my questions and responded to my emails almost immediately.

To add to that, considering all the services you get with the membership is an incredible deal - it Includes mastering, mixing feedback, courses, and community. It's everything you need, and their customer service is top-notch.

As good as their YouTube videos are, I knew this would be a fantastic resource; as a college professor myself, I recognize excellent instruction, and Sage has a knack for breaking down complex processes and demonstrating how plugins work in concise bursts that never overwhelm the learner.

More importantly, you will come to understand when to use the tools in your arsenal and why to do so. You, thus, are learning how to ask better questions of the mastering engineers that you have access to through your membership, and ultimately, you are being empowered to become an engineer yourself!

Review by John G.

I started using Sage Audio to master my songs about three to four years ago - I wish I had found them earlier. Their mastering makes my mixes sound like professional songs, and they're a delight to work with.

Also, they have a very active community of musicians, producers, and engineers, along with mixing and mastering courses - which have provided me with so much useful information. On top of that, the mixing feedback is excellent, and they continually provide thoughtful suggestions, which I've found invaluable for improving my mixes. It's worth checking them out - you will not be disappointed.

Review by Brandon T.

I had Sage Audio master my last 3 albums, and I plan to use them for my next release too. They do an exceptional job of creating balance and clarity for each project, and they are so friendly and helpful when it comes to answering questions and offering suggestions.

Their experience is invaluable, and they have truly insightful feedback when it comes to mixing and mastering. I have tried other companies in the past and came back to Sage to get that professionally polished sound every time.

Review by Ben V.

A few months ago, a friend of mine recommended I try Sage Audio for my final master's. Being a mix engineer myself, I was hesitant at first due to the fact that in the past, when using online mastering, I found that no engineer would care for the track as much as I would.

Knowing the basic rule that you always want to have another set of ears to master anything you've mixed, I realized I had hit a plateau in how far I could take my final master. To my surprise, Sage and the team took my master's to a level I could not reach, both dynamically and sonically.

I'm a full-time artist who is constantly recording, releasing, and traveling. The burden that the Sage team has taken off my shoulders by being a trustworthy mastering service is tremendous.

They have provided me with quick turnarounds while out of the country to meet deadlines for releases and are understanding & receptive when I request changes after hearing a master, even going as far as to follow up with me, confirming that I am 100% happy with the final master, quoting, "I'm not happy unless you're happy."

Another benefit to Sage Audio is their library of mixing and mastering tutorials. Any good sound engineer knows that there are a million ways to reach a rich, dynamic final mix or mastering and that you're never done learning how to engineer. Sage's courses offer a great refresher on fundamentals and a clear understanding of complex techniques to help push you as an engineer.

Cheers Sage, thanks for the excellent service!

Review by Charlie E.

My writing partner and I have recorded and mixed 2 albums and a few singles, the first 2 albums we did were mastered by a different company. The masters were ok, but from that experience, we developed a better and more critical understanding of the mastering process.

Upon preparing to have our 3th album mastered, we did some research and exploration for other mastering options and found Sage Audio - which is where we had our latest album mastered.

We were both very much impressed with the work, the communication, and the willingness to create the exact sound we wanted for the album. We definitely heard a difference in the mastering - Sage Audio masters are clean, clear, and professional.

On top of that, we really enjoyed receiving mixing feedback, which was really helpful for making adjustments to bring the most out of our mixes before sending for mastering. For anyone seeking true audio professionals, I recommend Sage Audio!

Review by Sam V.

Sage Audio mastering engineers are the best I've ever worked with! I've been an Artist, Songwriter & Producer for over 12 years, and believe me, over the years, I've worked with several studios and countless engineers. But since I connected with Sage Audio, those days are over. I took a chance on something new - sent my first mix to see how it would go, and they didn't waste any time lol, they responded the very next day, and the master I got back far exceeded my expectations.

The level of quality and attention to detail was impressive. It was everything & more than what I hoped for, and now I will never trust my mixes in any other hands. They've quickly become my number 1 go-to-guys for mastering, hands down.

Not to mention, they also give you in-depth mixing feedback to help you improve your mixes before sending them for mastering. You can't go wrong with Sage Audio. These guys definitely deserve all the credit in the world. I would strongly recommend them to anyone out there looking for solid professionals to polish your mix. I can personally promise you, Sage Audio will deliver every time!

Review by Ryan B.

I've been using Sage Audio for mastering my tracks over the past year and a half, and they've been great on every front.

If I need a track mastered within a week, they usually get back to me with a high-quality finished master within a few days, and the cost is negligible compared to what some other studios are charging.

They also have an active community, and their mixing feedback option is super helpful; their suggestions are specific, revealing, and accurate.

I highly recommend them if you're a musician, producer, or mixing engineer who needs that last bit of polish before you release. They're worth every penny.

START NOW

LISTEN TO OUR SAMPLES

pop / country
Meghan Linsey
pop
Savannah Stewart
county / pop
Cody Belew
pop / rock
Bree
pop / indie
Alex Saad
country
Tyler Cain
pop / soft-rock
Joel Schisler
pop / international
AJ Castillo
country
Something Distant
pop / rock / indie
The Last Ride
indie
Maudlin Strangers
hip-hop
Futuristic
pop
Chelsea Lankes
electronic
Mizer & Goetz (Remix)
jazz
Mike Goudreau
pop / electronic
JNGL
indie / rock
The Gills
pop
Melissa Vanfleet
electronic
Marcus Sezabo
pop
Cody Belew
indie
I Am Strikes
electronic
Dveloped
pop / country
Meghan Linsey
pop / rock
Bree
pop / international
Tulus
electronic
Psilodump
rock / hard-rock
Wendy Icon
hip-hop
Necro & DMC
hip-hop
Brent Perry
hip-hop
Futuristic
pop
April Kry
pop
Shamina
rock
Guy Franklin
country
Chris James
rock
All Hands
pop / rock / indie
Kenzie Gregg
hip-hop
Litkaby
rock
Prospect
jazz
Mike Goudreau
soundtrack
Nicolas Giard
soundtrack
Phoenix Music Group
jazz
Richard Keller
electronic
Terra Lumina
soundtrack
Bear & Cat
pop / jazz / blues
Joel Schisler
electronic / pop
Alecs
electronic
Ethan
electronic / dubstep
Mad Mikey
indie
The Rhine Tones
hard-rock
Element Of Chaos
hard-rock
Kevin Carter
international / pop
Gilbert Pohan
pop
Justin Garner

Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...

The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.

HERE'S WHAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR SAGE AUDIO MEMBERSHIP

Private 1-on-1 mixing feedback directly from us

Custom mastering service tailored to your specific sound

Access to our 23-video structured step-by-step mixing course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Multitracks for mixing practice are included

Access to our 19-video structured step-by-step mastering course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Unmastered mixes for mastering practice are included

Access to the thriving Sage Audio community for discussions and networking

No commitments

If we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free

What's the Endgame?... You have mixes that sound 10 times better — songs you're proud of that make people say "Wow."

We guarantee 10 times better sound, or you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free. Members get 1-on-1 mixing feedback, mastering service, courses & access to our thriving community. That’s about it.

If you want to transform your mixes from a source of pain and struggle to a source of pleasure and fulfillment, JOIN NOW. The struggle stops now. START NOW