How to Master Music for TV and Sync Licensing
Quick Answer
Mastering music for tv and other sync licensing opportunities includes creating multiple versions of the song you intend to submit. Although most broadcasting occurs at an integrated loudness of -24 LUFS, mastering for tv and film will vary in loudness, and be dependent upon the type of programming.
How to Master Music for TV and Sync Licensing in Detail
The process of mastering for sync licensing is certainly different than typical mastering. Granted, certain aspects like ensuring overall sound quality, avoiding unwanted distortions, creating a balanced frequency spectrum, and other aspects of mastering remain similar if not the same.
Most mastering sessions occur as a stereo session; however, mastering for sync is typically stem mastering.
However, there are many variables that need to be considered when mastering music for film, tv, or other sync licensing opportunities. Furthermore, the technical differences change almost entirely.
Although the basic principles of digital recording and processing, i.e. sampling rate, bit depth, and other technical factors remain the same, the overall perceived loudness, as well as the signal chain and processing methods, alter drastically.
The routing of a sync mastering session is much different than a typical mastering session.
In order to better understand how to master for tv and sync licensing, let’s delve into a session and compare the differences between it and the familiarity of a typical mastering session.
With this session, we’ll be able to determine what processing is used, and how you can model your processing after this. Additionally, we’ll learn what not to do when creating multiple versions of your master for sync licensing.
We’ll also be looking into how the type of programing affects how the music will be incorporated, which may have some implications for the master you create.
Unlike a music release, the master does not stand alone. It will most likely be combined with other audio.
If you have a mix that you need mastered for sync licensing, or perhaps just in general, send it to us here:
We’ll master it for you, and send you a free mastered sample of it.
What does a Mastering for Sync Session Look Like?
Typically, mastering sessions are set up using a stereo mix file. All processing then occurs to this stereo file.
Most mastering sessions use a stereo file as the source signal.
When mastering for sync licensing, typically the mastering session will be accomplished using stems, or groups of recorded instruments. Using these groups will allow for flexibility when bouncing your tracks.
Stems include the full instrument group and all of its relative processing, like reverb compression, etc.
Of course, this added flexibility is a good thing, as it allows you to create multiple versions that producers can then use in accordance with what they’re trying to accomplish for a given scene or segment - but technically speaking, it will present some challenges during mastering.
Say you had a stem mastering session in which you added the entirety of your processing to the stereo output. This would work fine for a stereo mastering session; however, as you begin to export various versions of the song, you may run into some complications.
When creating masters for sync, do not use your master output for processing.
The reason being, when instrument groups are either added or muted, any processing on the master channel will process the information differently, and therefore create a different sound.
A compressor on the master output will compress differently whenever a differing signal is put in.
For example, say you have all your processing on the stereo output, and one of your plugins is a compressor. This compressor, as all compressors do, reacts to the signal based on its incoming amplitude.
If you were to export a track with all of the stems and then export a track with half of the stems muted, how would this affect your compressor?
In this example, the Guitars and Pianos/Strings are running through the compressor. If another signal was sent through, the compressor would react differently.
As you can imagine, changing the amplitude of the signal going into your compressor, will in turn change that compressor’s behavior, which will alter its sound. With that said, if you were to use this method for all of your exports, each one would sound different, considering the processing would be different.
This is especially problematic is your exports are intended to be combined at any point, to recreate a full mix. This would be the case for stems intended to represent full instrument groups.
Ideally, you could bounce these 4 shown stems out independently, and if recombined after being exported, it would sound the same as if they were all exported at the same time as one stereo file.
With that in mind, it is best to keep any processing on the stereo output to a minimum and attempt to retain that processing to the individual stems or groups of those stems.
How to Keep Processing on the Stems, Not the Output
The obvious answer to this issue is to solely process the stems - this way if the stems were to be bounced out individually, when combined, they would recreate the entirety of the stereo master.
This process starts by finding like groups of instruments, or ones that you'd like to process together.
Granted, trying to do this with say, 16 stems, may be a bit of a challenge, or take up too much processing power. If this is the situation you find yourself in, there is an easy solution.
How to Easily Consolidate Stems:
Step 1: Organize your session into groups of instruments you’d like to pair together. For example, all of the stringed instrument stems, or all percussion stems.
Color coordinating your tracks will help keep your sync mastering session organized.
Step 2: Using a bus or an aux send, send these stems to an auxiliary track. Set the send to unity, and be sure to name your auxiliary track with an appropriate name.
Send your groups of stems to auxiliary channels using a bus or aux send. The exact method depends on the DAW you're using.
Step 3: Repeat this process for all groups of stems that you’d like to process collectively. Again, set the sends to unity and name the auxiliary track accordingly.
Create these auxiliary channels for the drums, or vocals, or whichever way will make it easiest for you to create the versions of your master you need.
Step 4 : Once each group has been sent to its respective auxiliary track, solo the auxiliary tracks, and begin working exclusively with them. You can still adjust the channel faders of the individual stems to affect how much of it is sent to the auxiliary track (given that the aux send isn’t ‘pre-fader’).
After routing your signal to auxiliary channels, solo these channels to only monitor them.
Step 5 : Begin to add processing to the auxiliary channels.
Processing to these stems should be modeled after processing used for typical stereo mastering.
Step 6 : Ensure that after processing, there is no clipping or peaking on your master output. No limiter should be used on the master output.
Ensure that after processing, your output is not peaking.
You can now adjust the channel faders of your auxiliary channels to quickly adjust each stem groups volume. You can also solo and export any individual group or groups of stems, making it incredibly quick to create a new version of your master.
To create a new version of your master, simply solo the group stems you want.
Furthermore, if you were to implement auxiliary sends for reverb, delay, or any effect you wanted to use in parallel to your stem, you could route that send to your auxiliary group send. This way, you can easily adjust the amount of processing, or even bounce that processing out individually, or omit it from your bounce.
For example, this option would result in a master without percussion.
This same technique can be used during the mixing process, to create multiple mix versions. The only difference would be the type of processing applied to each auxiliary channel.
The reason for doing all of this routing is to add flexibility to your sync mastering process, considering many versions of your master will need to be created. It could be detrimental to your chances of garnering a sync license if the stems you created, which were meant to be combined to create a full master, didn’t combine correctly.
By using this method, you can ensure that your stems can be recombined without sounding different from your full stereo master , and you can easily create new versions of your master without introducing unwanted processing errors.
If you’d like to learn more about the type of processing that you could add to your auxiliary tracks to create your master, check out a blog post on that topic:
It goes into great detail about how you can master music, using a well-established and thorough signal chain.
If you’d prefer to have someone else master your mix or mixes, you can send it to us here:
We’ll master it for you - all you’d have to do is create a short account and upload the song.
What Master Versions Should I Create for Sync Licensing?
Now that you know how to accurately create stem groups that accurately combine to recreate your stereo master, and how to easily create new versions of your master, the next logical question is, what versions should I create?
In all honesty, this will depend on the library you’re uploading to; however, there are some important versions that almost all libraries and producers will want and expect.
Typical Versions of Your Master to Export for Sync Licensing:
- Instrumental (No Vocals or Vocal Processing)
- Vocal Only (No Instrumental or Instrumental Processing)
- No Percussion (Only Instrumentation and vocals, with No Drums or Percussion Instruments)
- Percussion Only (No Vocal, Instrumental, or Instrumental Processing)
In addition to these versions, you may want to create a drum and bass version, or export only the guitar stems - again the process detailed above will allow you to quickly do this. Furthermore, 30-second versions or 60-second versions may also be desired by the producer to preview the track.
This example would result in an instrumental.
These are some things to keep in mind when creating masters for sync licensing. You’re not creating only one version, you’re creating multiple versions that can either be combined together or stand-alone.
This example would result in a master without percussion. Deselecting 'Solo' on the auxiliary channel will automatically mute all tracks routed to that auxiliary channel.
If you’re curious about stems and want to know more about the difference between typical mastering and stem mastering, check out our blog post on the topic:
It’s full of great information about what stem mastering actually is.
How Loud Should a Sync License Master Be?
An audio master used for sync licensing can vary in amplitude, and will most likely be turned down during the video production process. With that in mind, there is no need to use significant gain reduction; however, the track should be somewhat close in volume to a typical master.
-16 or -15 LUFS is a good level to master your music to - be it for sync licensing or a traditional release.
As stated previously, tv programs are typically aired with an integrated LUFS of -24. When hearing this, some might come to the conclusion that the master should be made at the same volume; however, this is necessarily the case.
When considering all of the various noise that may be in a program, such as dialogue, ambient noises, or perhaps explosions and crashes if it’s more action-oriented - it may be in the best interest of the mastering engineer to have their master sound similar to how a typical master would.
Movies and television productions include a lot more ambient noise than a traditional music release.
With that said, your sync master should be upheld to the same sonic standards to which your typical master would be upheld. It should sound balanced, full, and complex like a traditional master would.
The primary difference is that there is no known LUFS to which you should master. For example, if you were to master for Apple Music, you would likely master your track near -16 LUFS; however, this same target doesn’t exist when mastering for sync and television.
Mastering for a streaming service or music medium like a CD, makes what loudness you should master to more obvious.
This lack of a clear and distinct answer is exacerbated by the many variables a television program can have. Since the LUFS is measured based on the integrated loudness of the program, and not the dialogue, listeners who want to hear the dialogue will need to turn up and down their programs due to various changes in the additional sound sources present in the recording.
The strange loudness standards that dictate the loudness of television programs often results in having to adjust a program's volume.
I’m sure you’ve come across a situation in which you’ve had to turn up and down a show, simply to hear the dialogue, but then you're met with the music or the ambient noise making the volume too loud. This is primarily due to the loudness of programs being determined by the entire program’s LUFS and not just the dialogue's.
All this to say, that determining the best loudness of your master can be difficult given the many variables inherent to a television show’s, commercial’s, or movie’s audio.
Determining the best loudness for television can be difficult - especially if you don't know what other sound sources will be in the program.
With that in mind, it’s best to master your sync master to a reasonably loud level and to master any stems intended to be combined, to a level that when combined, equate to the volume of your stereo master.
If you don’t know what a good loudness for mastering is, you should look into a blog post we have on the same topic:
It details the different volumes that work well for modern mastering, and why these levels work.
The Differences between a Sync Mastering and Traditional Mastering Session:
- Sync mastering sessions are typically stem mastering sessions, whereas traditional mastering sessions are stereo.
- Sync mastering sessions result in multiple versions whereas traditional stereo mastering sessions typically only result in one version per song.
- The volumes used for a traditional music release are well known by mastering engineers and serve as a reliable target, whereas, mastering for sync licensing is more variable and can depend on the project.
If you’d like to learn more about digital mastering, you can check out our blog post on the topic :
Or, if you’d prefer to learn about analog mastering, take a look at the blog post we’ve written about that:
Conclusion
Mastering for sync licensing it definitely a different practice then mastering for a traditional music release. the fundamentals are the same in terms of compression, limiting, equalization and so on, but, the actual structure of the session, as well as the final product, is very different.
When Mastering for Sync Licensing you Need to Keep Certain Things in Mind.
These include:
- Knowing the general type of production to better understand the context the master would be included in.
- Know which versions either the library you’re uploading to, or the producer are expecting, and then create those versions.
- How to create versions of your master that can either be combined to create the full stereo master, or standalone.
- How to create a new version of your master without creating or introducing unwanted processing errors.
Just like a traditional music master, your sync master should sound good, full, complex, and inviting to any listener; however, it shouldn’t be loud to the extent of needing excessive limiting.
Considering most masters will need to be turned down, creating an excessively loud master serves no purpose. Furthermore, losing dynamics can lead to a lackluster master, so it’s best to have one that is slightly quieter, but preserves dynamics.
Additionally, to create a sync master, you need to be able to separate your processing in a very specific manner. If you haven’t already, it’s best to read the section titled “How to Keep Processing on the Stems, not the Output.”
It demonstrates how you can arrange your session and route your signal in such a way, that multiple versions can be created without processing errors. Once you understand how to accomplish this, you can create the multiple master versions typically required for sync licensing.
These include instrumentals, vocal-only versions, versions without drums or only drums, and a slew of other options that producers need to adequately incorporate music into their productions.
Whenever you do end up creating these masters, keep in mind that they do not stand alone - they’ll be included in scenes with dialogue, background noise, and perhaps explosions or other special effects.
With that in mind, simply try to create the best sounding master possible - as a balanced, full, and complex master will be needed to compete with the other sound sources used.
If this is something you’d rather leave to a mastering professional, send us your mix or mixes here:
We’ll master it for you and send you a free mastered sample.
Have you ever mastered a song for television or a sync licensing deal?
Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...
You're literally one step away from 10 times better sound.
The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.
START NOWREAD OUR REVIEWS
Review by Joel S.
If you're looking for great mastering, Sage is where you need to be. I've been working with Sage for years - they do an amazing job and are really easy to work with.
They actually care about your project and want it to sound its best just as much as you do. I'm always excited to get a song or project back from mastering. I've tried many mastering companies, and Sage is by far the best.
If you're serious about your music, it's worth checking them out; you won't be disappointed - they make your mixes sound balanced and professional.
They also offer mixing feedback to help improve your mixes and mixing and mastering education courses to help improve your sound. Shout out to Sage Audio! you can't go wrong - like I said, if you're serious about your music, this is your studio.
Review by April K.
I've been getting my masters done by Sage Audio for the past 4 years now, and I've tried multiple places in my 15 years in the music business. Sage Audio is the only one that has given me the quality I love!
Their mastering membership is an excellent deal for anyone looking for professional mastering and full customer service. Also, I never had an issue with submitting new mix versions for remastering or asking for too many revisions - they have always been very respectful about remastering new mixes and making any adjustments I wanted. I'm staying with Sage, no need to look further! Best masters out there!
Review by Justin G.
Sage Audio is by far the best audio engineering company I've found. I've been with them for 8 years, and it's clear that they set the bar high in regard to mastering services. Their online platform makes it easy to upload tracks and communicate directly with your own dedicated mastering engineer, and their customer service is excellent.
Overall, the sound achieved by Sage Audio engineers is awesome. Their mastering brings out the best in each track - improving clarity, depth, and impact - and they focus on crafting personalized masters that are specific to your needs.
Another thing that sets Sage Audio apart from other mastering services is that the mastering is actually done with your dedicated mastering engineer and not some sort of AI software, and you get full customer service and feedback on your mixes too.
Their commitment to delivering top-tier mastering while maintaining consistent communication shows how much they care about their clients' music. For anyone looking for a personalized online mastering that combines top-level quality with excellent customer service, look no further than Sage Audio.
Review by James T.
The engineers at Sage Audio could not have made my first commercial audio experience any better! Every time I emailed to get a question answered, I worked with the same person consistently.
They know what they are doing; after listening to my masters on numerous systems, I heard my music in a whole new light. My bass and kick were tighter, not muddy, and hit with the "grit" that I intended. My mids and highs were clear, vibrant, and presented well on all stereos and devices.
I could have never achieved this level of quality without their diligent minds and professional know-how! If you are looking to get your project up to a commercial level while meeting a budget, Sage Audio is the place to go!
Review by Rebecca D.
Sage Audio is by far the best mastering service! They are the most professional, kind, and loyal people. Every song they mastered was spot on!
For artists looking to have their music mastered, they have an awesome and affordable mastering membership and are dedicated to making every mix sound like a professional master. Thank you, Sage Audio, for transforming my music!
Review by Daniel S.
The last ten years of my audio mixing career have been plagued by frustration, self-doubt, and compulsive shopping for magic game-changing plugins that can fix my poor mixes... guess what... it was all wasted time and money; I was shooting in the dark.
Until now.
I had heard about Sage Audio a long time ago, but at that time, their pricing seemed too expensive - how wrong I was.
Firstly, there is no substitute for hard work; you must do your part; what this service gave me was perspective - what's different about this master from my own? why? what am I missing? how can I improve my final mixdown in order to get the best possible master?
The included courses are really useful and well explained, but to me, the real power is the community of engineers offering their feedback; there's nothing like a second set of ears, or a lot of sets of ears! Getting other engineers' advice is priceless, and fixing common problems suddenly became very simple.
The best part is that I have made a bunch of mixes on my own now and am starting to get incredibly good responses - my confidence is up, with no additional plugins, no new DAW, not even new monitors.
I've been a Sage Audio member for about 9 months now, and all services are excellent. The 1-on-1 mixing feedback is incredibly helpful, and the professional community is way more active than I could have imagined. I'll be here for the long haul. So, if you're ready to take your music to the next level and change a lot of misconceptions, this is your place!
Review by Thomas E.
I am a musician and songwriter with decent recording skills, but I could never get my final mixes mastered to where the EQ, volume, and clarity sounded good on all playback systems without distortion.
I did extensive research on mastering and tried expensive studio headphones, but I never quite "mastered" mastering. It was very frustrating and took way too much time away from my music.
Then I found Sage Audio, and it sounded like just the service I needed at a reasonable price, so I joined their membership.
It was a game-changing decision. They always respond quickly and are focused on pleasing their customers. They mastered several of my songs, and they all came out perfect.
One of them took three takes because I had to change some levels and panning, but each time, they said, "No problem, we want you to be 100% happy with the final master."
They even asked for ways to improve their service, and they have a unique service where you can upload your mixes and receive feedback directly from them for improvement. I also found in the community, there are great musicians, singers, and songwriters to collaborate with for future projects.
In summary, Sage Audio has saved me a lot of time and provided great masters for my songs, way better than I could have ever done! I give them my highest recommendation.
Review by Frank B.
I've been using Sage Audio for a while now and have been very pleased with their professionalism and quality of work!
I'm NOT new to the audio production world and have been mixing and self-mastering for over a decade. I've used Grammy-winning mastering engineers as well as online AI-driven mastering services, so I know the full range of mastering services available to artists and their producers.
What sets Sage apart, IMO, and, in my experience, is that they are very customer-centric and will do almost anything to make the customer happy with their work. An example is a recent master I wasn't 100% happy with because it was too compressed for Classical material. They jumped right on it, giving me another more gently compressed master, which I'm delighted with. This was a NO EXTRA CHARGE. I know from experience that this isn't the norm in this industry, where egos prevail.
An example of Sage's superior work is when a client I'm working with wanted proof that it was better than a well-known, low-cost AI-driven mastering service. While my instructions to both Sage and the online service were close, only Sage had a human to interpret some of the instructions. As a result, the Sage master was considerably LOUDER and had more HEADROOM to boot. You can't ask for much more for a Pop song.
In summary, I'd recommend Sage to anyone looking for professional mastering for their upcoming release.
Give them a shot. I'm sure you'll be pleased.
Review by Dan Y.
Sage Audio has been a lifesaver for me. Mastering was my weakest point, and I only wish I could've found them sooner. I have used their services for the last 6 months and have also recommended them to several of my musician friends. Every track I send comes back sounding brilliant.
I once experimented by mastering one of my songs by myself, by another leading mastering studio, and also by Sage Audio. Sage's master was hands-down the best: clear, loud, yet dynamic, and the overall sound was smooth. I can say with 100% confidence Sage Audio is the best mastering service around.
It's also a pleasure connecting with their team on a personal level; they are very attentive to details and respond fast.
Review by Irene F.
I found Sage Audio when I was searching for a company that could master my original songs. My initial email was responded to in less than ten minutes. I explained my situation, then created an account and uploaded my mix for mastering.
I let my engineer know what was bothering me in the song and what I would like it to sound like. In a short time, he sent me a notification email to download the master and asked if it was to my liking.
On first listen, it blew me away, as it contained everything I had asked for, and the sound was vibrant, clear, and, quite frankly, perfect. I've been with Sage Audio ever since - they're so easy to work with, friendly, eager to help, and highly professional. I would recommend them to anyone.
Review by Aaron C.
I first used Sage audio 3 years ago to get an album mastered. I hadn't used an outside service for mastering before, so I didn't know exactly what to expect, but I had learned a lot from the Sage Audio YouTube channel and liked the clear, concise way the videos explained various audio principles, so I felt comfortable using their services.
Not only did the masters sound amazing (dynamic, but still as loud as I wanted), but the engineer answered all of my questions and responded to my emails almost immediately.
To add to that, considering all the services you get with the membership is an incredible deal - it Includes mastering, mixing feedback, courses, and community. It's everything you need, and their customer service is top-notch.
As good as their YouTube videos are, I knew this would be a fantastic resource; as a college professor myself, I recognize excellent instruction, and Sage has a knack for breaking down complex processes and demonstrating how plugins work in concise bursts that never overwhelm the learner.
More importantly, you will come to understand when to use the tools in your arsenal and why to do so. You, thus, are learning how to ask better questions of the mastering engineers that you have access to through your membership, and ultimately, you are being empowered to become an engineer yourself!
Review by John G.
I started using Sage Audio to master my songs about three to four years ago - I wish I had found them earlier. Their mastering makes my mixes sound like professional songs, and they're a delight to work with.
Also, they have a very active community of musicians, producers, and engineers, along with mixing and mastering courses - which have provided me with so much useful information. On top of that, the mixing feedback is excellent, and they continually provide thoughtful suggestions, which I've found invaluable for improving my mixes. It's worth checking them out - you will not be disappointed.
Review by Brandon T.
I had Sage Audio master my last 3 albums, and I plan to use them for my next release too. They do an exceptional job of creating balance and clarity for each project, and they are so friendly and helpful when it comes to answering questions and offering suggestions.
Their experience is invaluable, and they have truly insightful feedback when it comes to mixing and mastering. I have tried other companies in the past and came back to Sage to get that professionally polished sound every time.
Review by Ben V.
A few months ago, a friend of mine recommended I try Sage Audio for my final master's. Being a mix engineer myself, I was hesitant at first due to the fact that in the past, when using online mastering, I found that no engineer would care for the track as much as I would.
Knowing the basic rule that you always want to have another set of ears to master anything you've mixed, I realized I had hit a plateau in how far I could take my final master. To my surprise, Sage and the team took my master's to a level I could not reach, both dynamically and sonically.
I'm a full-time artist who is constantly recording, releasing, and traveling. The burden that the Sage team has taken off my shoulders by being a trustworthy mastering service is tremendous.
They have provided me with quick turnarounds while out of the country to meet deadlines for releases and are understanding & receptive when I request changes after hearing a master, even going as far as to follow up with me, confirming that I am 100% happy with the final master, quoting, "I'm not happy unless you're happy."
Another benefit to Sage Audio is their library of mixing and mastering tutorials. Any good sound engineer knows that there are a million ways to reach a rich, dynamic final mix or mastering and that you're never done learning how to engineer. Sage's courses offer a great refresher on fundamentals and a clear understanding of complex techniques to help push you as an engineer.
Cheers Sage, thanks for the excellent service!
Review by Charlie E.
My writing partner and I have recorded and mixed 2 albums and a few singles, the first 2 albums we did were mastered by a different company. The masters were ok, but from that experience, we developed a better and more critical understanding of the mastering process.
Upon preparing to have our 3th album mastered, we did some research and exploration for other mastering options and found Sage Audio - which is where we had our latest album mastered.
We were both very much impressed with the work, the communication, and the willingness to create the exact sound we wanted for the album. We definitely heard a difference in the mastering - Sage Audio masters are clean, clear, and professional.
On top of that, we really enjoyed receiving mixing feedback, which was really helpful for making adjustments to bring the most out of our mixes before sending for mastering. For anyone seeking true audio professionals, I recommend Sage Audio!
Review by Sam V.
Sage Audio mastering engineers are the best I've ever worked with! I've been an Artist, Songwriter & Producer for over 12 years, and believe me, over the years, I've worked with several studios and countless engineers. But since I connected with Sage Audio, those days are over. I took a chance on something new - sent my first mix to see how it would go, and they didn't waste any time lol, they responded the very next day, and the master I got back far exceeded my expectations.
The level of quality and attention to detail was impressive. It was everything & more than what I hoped for, and now I will never trust my mixes in any other hands. They've quickly become my number 1 go-to-guys for mastering, hands down.
Not to mention, they also give you in-depth mixing feedback to help you improve your mixes before sending them for mastering. You can't go wrong with Sage Audio. These guys definitely deserve all the credit in the world. I would strongly recommend them to anyone out there looking for solid professionals to polish your mix. I can personally promise you, Sage Audio will deliver every time!
Review by Ryan B.
I've been using Sage Audio for mastering my tracks over the past year and a half, and they've been great on every front.
If I need a track mastered within a week, they usually get back to me with a high-quality finished master within a few days, and the cost is negligible compared to what some other studios are charging.
They also have an active community, and their mixing feedback option is super helpful; their suggestions are specific, revealing, and accurate.
I highly recommend them if you're a musician, producer, or mixing engineer who needs that last bit of polish before you release. They're worth every penny.
LISTEN TO OUR SAMPLES
Ready to make your mixes sound 10 times better, 10 times faster...
The best part is... it's risk-free, if we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it.
HERE'S WHAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR SAGE AUDIO MEMBERSHIP
- One-on-One Mixing Feedback
Private 1-on-1 mixing feedback directly from us
- Mastering Service
Custom mastering service tailored to your specific sound
- Mixing Course
Access to our 23-video structured step-by-step mixing course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Multitracks for mixing practice are included
- Mastering Course
Access to our 19-video structured step-by-step mastering course, including walkthrough sessions for 8 genres, featuring mixing chains with free and paid plugins — Unmastered mixes for mastering practice are included
- Community
Access to the thriving Sage Audio community for discussions and networking
- Cancel Anytime
No commitments
- Risk-Free Money-Back Guarantee
If we can't make your mixes sound 10 times better, you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free
What's the Endgame?... You have mixes that sound 10 times better — songs you're proud of that make people say "Wow."
We guarantee 10 times better sound, or you don't pay for it, so it's risk-free. Members get 1-on-1 mixing feedback, mastering service, courses & access to our thriving community. That’s about it.
If you want to transform your mixes from a source of pain and struggle to a source of pleasure and fulfillment, JOIN NOW. The struggle stops now. START NOW
